Skip to content
Menu
The End of Linearity
  • Home
  • The Love of My Life
  • CLOUD
    • CLOUDArchitecture
    • CLOUDCircles
    • CLOUDEducation
    • CLOUDFinance
    • CLOUDGovt
    • CLOUDHealth
    • CLOUDTalent
  • TEDx World Tour
    • TEDxTallaght – 10.17.2013
    • TEDxTrastevere – 10.16.2013
    • TEDxWeldQuay – 10.12.2013
    • TEDxAustin – 2.19.2011
  • Gary & The End of Linearity
The End of Linearity
In a Miscellaneous World, There is no Beginning or End

The Texas Textbook Wars

Posted On March 10, 2010

There is an interesting discussion underway on the “Texas Textbook Wars” over at FoxNews.com. Of course, when one posts a comment in these sorts of online venues, one always runs the risk of the emotional response to a substantive post.  However, there is also the probing question, though, that deserves more attention, which is why I am making a more thorough answer to one of those questions here at theendoflinearity.

My original post went as follows:

Of course, the really interesting part of this debate is the topics that are just under the surface. In a world of iPads, Kindles and digital content, we are still talking about books! In the era of Encyclopedia Britannica, “content” was static because it was printed on paper, and it was not cost effective to print more than every 7 or 8 years. The content was never static; the delivery and production mechanisms were.

In a world of Wikipedia, content can now be more dynamic, because the costs to deliver it are dramatically reduced. Think about it. If there is a mistake in Britannica, it will take years to have it corrected. If there is a mistake at Wikipedia, it can be fixed in seconds. Even better, debates like this one can have all of the arguments available to students, not just the conclusion. Facts like 1+1=2 are easy to validate; other “facts” are bit more challenging to nail down firmly.

Please check out these two posts for much longer expositions on the real battles we should be fighting over textbooks: Learning to Read – Books or Words? Beyond Schools: A Foundation for Education in the 21st Century.

The more useful question (the other one told me I had a lot to learn) went like this:

i agree with you but this also means that what they dont want us to see can be rewritten just as easy

As I commented in the thread at FoxNews, I run the risk of making an assumption about who “they” is, however, I will define they for my purposes as either author, publisher or state board of education and answer the question posed from these three perspectives.

Let’s start with the authors.  From their perspective, the publishing world is not that far off from where musicians were in 2003 before the introduction of iTunes.  Publishers, in many ways, are very similar to the labels in the music space.  In an analog world, these labels were vital to distribution.  In a digital world, any author or musician can reach their audiences directly.  Of course, this doesn’t mean that publishers need to leave the scene.  Music labels that have figured out the digital world are making money; those that haven’t are not.  So, the bottomline is this.  There is incredible talent writing for textbooks, and there are teachers and others that have written amazing content, too, as well as curriculum that could reach the students.  No more publishers or SBOEs standing in the way of the content flow.  All that is written becomes available.

From the publishers perspective, I suspect many would love to see a business model evolve that would let more of their content be used more often and more effectively.  I also suspect they realize that their margins would grow exponentially if they could free themselves of the dead tree format known as books.  I also suspect that if publishers could publish their content digitally, they would also be able to “tag” it with both state standards codes, as well as with many other rich bits of metadata.

Why would this matter?  It matters because once there is rich metadata, then one can stop trying to figure which ONE book will satisfy the needs of every student, every district and every state.  You can have as many books as you need.  This leads to the ultimate in local control. Local school districts and individual families can set up their own unique filters.  The student still meets the state standards and assessment requirements, but they do it with the content that meets their personal ethical, religious or other standards. One size does not need to fit all.  Such an environment would move our moral and ethical debates back into the public square and out of the classroom.

And perhaps, get us closer to the individual rights our founders were trying to protect.  In order to believe what I want to believe, I need to let you believe in your unique beliefs, too.  More on individual rights here.

The most powerful effect of liberating content, authors and distributors is to suddenly create a whole new type of state board of education.  Just like the crowd-sourcing we’ve seen in other venues, there is no reason in the world to not crowd-source content.  Rather than less than 20 board members, elected by a small turnout of registered voters that represents an even smaller fraction of the total population, we can enable every learner and every citizen to have a vote.  Successful content that is used by many and is effective will be the content that wins out.  And, this ultimately is where the battle must be won, in the hearts and minds of our students, students that are both literate and prepared for a truly civil society.

Tags:eLearning, Metadata, Textbooks

Some Recent Items

  • October 2021
  • February 2021
  • April 2020
  • November 2019
  • March 2018
  • December 2017
  • July 2017
  • January 2017
  • September 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • June 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • November 2006

End of Linearity’s Tag Universe

#IHaveBeenProvoked #powdereddonuts Articles Banks Big Data Bob Kahn Cancer Cancer CDMS Connected Company Connected Economy Data Liquidity Data Silos Digital Weaver™ Dimensions Education eLearning FDA Gutenberg Press HB4294 Health 2.0 Conference Health IT Internet ISO 17442 Legal Entity Identifier LEI LLS Malaysia ME 1.0 Metadata Money RDBMS Sibos SWIFT TEDx TEDxWeldQuay Texas Lyceum Textbooks Vint Cerf Weaving WHAT I Am™ WHEN I Am™ WHERE I Am™ WHO I Am™ XBRL
© 2023 The End of Linearity | Powered by WordPress & Customizable Blogily